![]() This task may be performed by using the following Changing data type of any columnīefore changing the data type of a column make sure that data would not be compromised The reason is that identity value 101 is present in the tableĪnd your statement again tried to insert the same value. Statement would generate a violation of the PRIMARY KEY constraint and the statement Identity value to 100 as in above script. You have 150 records in the table with identity values 1 to 150. Make sure that there is no chance of identity value duplication. Values for new records would start from 100 now. ![]() Instead of the normal sequential flow, as a result of the above script, identity To fulfill the requirement through T-SQL the following ALTER TABLE Inefficiency depends upon amount ofĭata in table. Task may be a performance threat if done through the SSMS designer if the column Add new column in existing tableĪt any stage we may be required to add a new column in an existing table. To verify any change you may use system stored procedure sp_help In coming sections we will go through the use of T-SQL for the above mentioned Through SSMS designer then creation time would change to time of operation through That object has not been dropped and recreated. You may verify the fact later that whenever we would implement the above mentionedĬhanges through T-SQL the creation time of the object would not change. SELECT name AS TableName, create_date AS CreationTimeįROM sys.objects WHERE name = 'Employees' To test these changes let us first create a table in AdventureWorks. Removing IDENTITY PROPERTY for a column.Alter Increment parameter for IDENTITY value.Insert new column other than at the end of the table or changing order of.So in these cases using SSMS designer would become more appropriate. Still there are some operations that involve table drop and recreation both through Add a new column to the end of an existing table.These changes can be made using T-SQL or SMSS without causing a recreation of RESEEDING IDENTITY PROPERTY for a column.Changing ALLOW NULL setting of existing column.Such operations should be performed through T-SQL. To avoid the overhead of the table drop and recreation, The same operations through T-SQL would not dropĪnd re-create the table. There are few operations that when implemented through SSMS, would cause the Older versions of SQL Server may handle things a little differently. So as part of best practices always take time toĮxamine the object dependencies and also consider the data which may be affectedīy ALTER table operations.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |